Skip to main content

Alibaba: A Great Business Doesn’t Have To Be A Great Investment


In November 2020, just after the unexpected suspension of Ant Group’s IPO, an analysis of Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) was published on Seeking Alpha. Titled Alibaba: E-Commerce Giant In The Midst Of A Hurricane, the article delved into the challenges faced by the company during a volatile period. This analysis marked the beginning of a fascinating investment journey for many, offering valuable lessons and insights into the complexities of navigating market turbulence.

Alibaba was in freefall, its valuation cratering amid regulatory uncertainty, political tension, and investor fear. And yet, I was all in—convinced this Chinese juggernaut was dramatically undervalued. I didn’t know it at the time, but I was about to learn three vital principles that would shape my entire investing philosophy:

  1. Even when you're confident in the business, you can be wrong.

  2. Don't go too heavy too quickly.

  3. Cap your exposure to any single investment based on your overall portfolio.

Alibaba’s business fundamentals haven’t disappointed. But my investment results? Let’s just say they haven’t mirrored the brilliance of the underlying company. In this post, I’ll unpack why a wonderful business doesn’t always make for a wonderful investment—and what my journey with Alibaba taught me about patience, portfolio management, and market sentiment.


Act I: Conviction Without Restraint

In the fall of 2020, I began building my Alibaba position. At the time, U.S. stocks were surging to new highs, and China—by comparison—seemed like a contrarian bet. I believed Alibaba, a company with a wide moat, dominant market position, and growing revenues, was mispriced due to macro fears rather than business fundamentals.

I leaned heavily into my conviction. And while that conviction hasn’t been invalidated, the timing—ah, the timing—was brutal.

Despite Alibaba's strong balance sheet, its continued revenue growth, and its sprawling empire across e-commerce, cloud computing, logistics, fintech, and more, the stock became the poster child for geopolitical risk. Antitrust investigations, Jack Ma’s disappearance from public life, delisting fears, and tightening Chinese regulation created a perfect storm. Alibaba’s share price collapsed by more than 70% from its highs.

Yet I held on. And learned.


The Hard Lessons: Humility, Position Sizing, and Patience

I now follow the “5% rule” from Guy Spier—a principle I wish I had embraced earlier. His approach is simple but effective: begin with a 5% position in any company. If you're wrong, the pain is survivable. If you're right, there's still plenty of upside.

Here’s what a more measured, disciplined approach would have looked like in my own Alibaba investment, assuming a $95,000 portfolio and a max allocation of $5,000:


Had I followed this staggered approach, I would have averaged a cost basis of $92.33—a far better setup than front-loading during the early stages of the collapse. Most importantly, the risk would have been manageable. No sleepless nights, no panic selling.

As Charlie Munger wisely said:

"The big money is not in the buying and the selling, but in the waiting."


More Than E-Commerce: Alibaba’s True Scale

For investors stuck on the “Chinese Amazon” comparison, it’s easy to miss just how massive and diversified Alibaba is.

Alibaba operates a sprawling ecosystem:

  • E-Commerce: Taobao and Tmall dominate Chinese online retail.

  • Cloud Computing (Alibaba Cloud): A leading provider in China, expanding across Asia.

  • Logistics (Cainiao): A powerful logistics network for cross-border trade.

  • Fintech (Ant Group): Despite regulatory setbacks, it remains a vital player in digital finance.

  • International Ventures: Lazada in Southeast Asia, Trendyol in Turkey, and Daraz in South Asia.

  • AI & Data Intelligence: Investments in LLMs, smart cities, and AI-driven retail.

This is not a one-trick pony. Alibaba is a conglomerate with tech, infrastructure, and fintech tentacles—one that’s still growing revenue and deploying capital wisely. Since 2020, Alibaba’s revenue has nearly doubled. That kind of growth during a regulatory storm is nothing short of remarkable.


Common Sense Still Wins

Throughout the downturn, one sign kept reinforcing my bullish view: share buybacks.

Despite the noise, Alibaba’s management consistently repurchased stock, signaling strong confidence in the company’s long-term outlook. From 2021 to 2024, the company spent over $43 billion on share repurchases—a staggering amount for any business, especially one supposedly under siege.

When investors abandoned ship, Alibaba’s own board doubled down. If nothing else, this move underscored that insiders saw value where the market saw risk.

The company clearly has the cash to do it. Alibaba’s balance sheet remains rock-solid, with more than $60 billion in cash and short-term investments and minimal debt relative to its cash position.


Shifting Sentiment: From “Uninvestable” to AI Darling

Just a year ago, Wall Street’s view of China was grim. Talk of delistings, regulatory clampdowns, and geopolitical decoupling was everywhere. China was considered “uninvestable.” Yet in 2024, sentiment flipped almost overnight. Why?

Artificial Intelligence.

The same analysts who cried foul are now bullish on Alibaba’s AI ambitions. The company is building its own large language models (LLMs), integrating AI into its e-commerce logistics, and offering cloud-based AI tools across Asia. The pivot is paying off—not only in sentiment but also in stock performance. Alibaba’s stock has surged nearly 70% YTD in 2025.

Still, investors need to keep their expectations grounded. Sentiment is fickle. It changes faster than fundamentals.


Valuation: Still Undervalued—But No Longer Dirt Cheap

After four years of underperformance, Alibaba is finally gaining traction. But is it still undervalued?

Let’s run a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis using two scenarios—normal and best-case—to determine intrinsic value:

Assumptions for Both Cases:

  • EPS growth of 19.1% CAGR for the next 5 years

  • Slower growth (halved) in the subsequent 5 years

  • Terminal P/E Ratio: 15 (normal case), 18 (best case)

  • Discount Rate: 10% (reasonable benchmark)

Normal Case:

  • Intrinsic Value: $154.33

  • Current Price: ~$144 (as of March 2025)

  • Upside: 7.2%

Best Case:

  • Intrinsic Value: $193.71

  • Upside: 35.3%

These are conservative estimates. The market is starting to price in some of Alibaba’s upside, but not all of it. Based on the current environment, Alibaba is no longer a screaming buy—but it’s still a good buy for long-term investors.


Risks: They Haven’t Gone Away

Let’s not sugarcoat this. There are still risks—and some are unique to investing in Chinese companies:

  1. Regulatory Uncertainty: Chinese tech regulations can change rapidly. Crackdowns may return.

  2. VIE Structure: Foreign investors don’t own direct equity in Alibaba. The government could revoke these contracts.

  3. Geopolitical Tensions: U.S.-China relations could sour again, leading to sanctions or delisting threats.

  4. Commerce Saturation: E-commerce growth is slowing in China; future growth will depend on AI, cloud, and global expansion.

Alibaba acknowledges these uncertainties in its filings, warning of “unpredictable interpretation and enforcement” of PRC laws. These risks are real. But if you’re investing in Alibaba, they should already be baked into your expectations.


Why I’m Still Holding

Despite the volatility, I’ve never sold my Alibaba position. That’s not stubbornness—it’s conviction tempered by learning. I now follow clearer investing rules:

  • I assume I could be wrong—always.

  • I build positions gradually, not all at once.

  • I cap exposure to any one stock at a defined percentage of my total portfolio.

Alibaba has become a cornerstone case study in my evolution as an investor. It’s taught me that even when you’re right about a company, it doesn’t mean you’ll be rewarded immediately. Investing isn’t just about identifying great businesses—it’s about understanding when the market will finally agree with you.

As Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have often reminded us:

“It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.”

That’s exactly what Alibaba represents today.


Final Thoughts: A Great Teacher, A Fair Investment

Alibaba was never just another stock pick—it became a classroom for personal finance education. Through it, I learned patience. I learned how to weather sentiment cycles. And I learned the brutal truth of investing: you can be right too early and still be wrong in the eyes of the market.

Today, Alibaba is a fair buy with exciting long-term prospects in AI and cloud. It’s no longer the ultra-bargain it once was, but it’s still a wonderful business. For those with the stomach for geopolitical risk and a long time horizon, it offers asymmetric upside. For me, it remains a hold.

Looking back, I don't regret buying Alibaba. But I do wish I had invested in it with more wisdom and restraint. Now, I’m grateful for the education.

Because in the end, a great investment isn’t always about profit. Sometimes, it’s about perspective.


Disclosure: I’m long Alibaba. This article reflects my personal opinions and is not investment advice. Always do your own research.

Comments

Stop Guessing What a Stock Is Worth

FAST Graphs helps investors visualize a company’s earnings, valuation, dividends, and historical performance in one clear research platform. Compare price with fundamentals, identify potential overvaluation or undervaluation, and make decisions with greater confidence.

Research the business behind the stock.

Explore FAST Graphs Today

Disclosure: This advertisement may contain an affiliate link. I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

Popular posts from this blog

GPIQ Is The Clear Outperformer Over JEPQ: A Multi-Criteria Comparison

Investors seeking income and growth from Nasdaq-100 exposure have two popular ETF choices: GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF). Both tap into premium-income strategies, but after digging into the data, GPIQ emerges as the better performer on several fronts. Here’s why. What Are These Funds & How They Differ ETF Strategy & Key Attributes GPIQ Managed by Goldman Sachs; uses a covered-call (option overlay) strategy (writing calls on portions of its Nasdaq-100 exposure), dynamic in how much is “overlaid,” aiming for income + participation in upside. StockAnalysis +3 AInvest +3 PortfoliosLab +3 JEPQ Managed by JPMorgan; uses equity-linked notes (ELNs) and derivative structures, plus underlying Nasdaq-100 equity exposure. High yield tends to come with trade-offs in flexibility and cost. Tickeron +3 AInvest +3 StockAnalysis +3 Criteria: How GPIQ Outperforms Below are the main axes of comparison, and how ...

WPAY: A Weekly-Paying Alternative to YMAX — Promise, Pitfalls, and Potential

There’s a new kid on the yield block: WPAY (Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF). If your eyes glaze over at “ETFs of option income,” this is your crash course in why income investors are suddenly whispering “weekly distributions” like it’s the holy grail. Yes, YMAX has had its spotlight. But weekly paychecks have a psychological appeal. Who doesn’t like getting something in hand more often than “once a month, maybe”? This post breaks down: What WPAY is (structure, mechanics, positioning) How it stacks up vs. YMAX What the risks are (and many of them are nontrivial) What kind of investor it might suit (or not suit) Tactical allocation ideas and red flags to watch Let’s strap in. 1. What is WPAY? ETF, fund-of-funds, and weekly pay WPAY is a fund-of-ETFs that tracks the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index , which is made up of single-stock WeeklyPay™ ETFs . It gives you a diversified exposure to multiple weekly-distributing leveraged equity funds rolled ...

SCHD vs. VIG: Which One Is Better?

When it comes to dividend growth ETFs, two heavyweights constantly show up in investor conversations: Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) . Both funds focus on companies with strong dividend-paying track records, but they take very different approaches. The result? Distinct performance profiles, yield expectations, and suitability depending on your goals. This blog takes a deep dive into both ETFs, comparing their strategies, holdings, performance, fees, and ideal investor profiles to answer the big question: Which one is better—SCHD or VIG? 1. The Basics Before we get lost in the weeds, let’s start with the core facts. SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) Launch: 2011 Index: Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index Holdings: ~100 companies Expense Ratio: 0.06% Focus: High-quality U.S. dividend stocks with a strong yield + sustainability screen. Dividend Yield (2025): ~3.5–4.0% VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appre...