For income-hungry investors starved by low interest rates and unsure about growth stock valuations, the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) looks like a godsend. An 11% yield? From big tech stocks? With the JPMorgan name backing it? Where do I sign?
Hold your horses.
While the headline yield of JEPQ is certainly eye-popping, it’s not a free lunch. That yield comes with a few strings attached—some obvious, some buried in fine print that investors would be wise to understand before throwing their retirement savings into what seems like a magical income-generating machine.
This blog dives into what JEPQ actually does, where that 11% yield comes from, and why chasing high income might leave you with lower total returns and more risk than you bargained for.
What Is JEPQ, Anyway?
Let’s start with the basics.
JEPQ, launched by JPMorgan in May 2022, is the Nasdaq-100-focused sibling of its more famous cousin JEPI, the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. Like JEPI, JEPQ uses an equity premium strategy: it invests in a basket of equities—in this case, Nasdaq-100 stocks—and then uses covered call options to generate extra income.
In plain English? JEPQ owns some of the biggest and most dynamic tech-oriented companies in the world—think Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia—and then sells upside via call options to generate income. It’s like renting out your growth stocks to others who think they’ll go even higher, collecting the “rent” (the option premium), and using that to pay investors a fat dividend.
This “rent” is where the bulk of the 11% yield comes from—not dividends from the underlying stocks themselves, which are meager in the tech world.
The 11% Yield: How It Works
JEPQ doesn’t just magically spin cash out of thin air. The 11% yield is a combination of two sources:
-
Dividends from the underlying Nasdaq-100 stocks (minimal, often 1% or less annually).
-
Option premiums from writing call options on those stocks (the bulk of the yield).
Specifically, JEPQ uses ELNs (Equity-Linked Notes) to execute its covered call strategy. These instruments allow JPMorgan’s managers to synthetically replicate selling calls while giving them flexibility in terms of tax treatment and execution.
The income from those call options is then distributed monthly to investors. Hence the 11% trailing twelve-month yield.
But here’s the rub: this yield comes at a price. And no, I’m not talking about the 0.35% expense ratio (although that’s not nothing). The real cost is the opportunity cost—the upside you give up by capping your gains.
The Trade-Off: Income vs. Growth
Let’s say you own a traditional Nasdaq-100 ETF, like QQQ. When the tech market surges—say during a rally driven by AI hype or a Fed pivot—your returns are uncapped. If Nvidia jumps 50%, you benefit fully.
With JEPQ? Not so fast.
By selling call options, JEPQ is giving someone else the right to buy those gains. If Nvidia rockets higher, JEPQ collects a little premium from the call option… and then sits on the sidelines while the upside is handed off to someone else.
In essence, you’re trading growth for income. This strategy works beautifully in sideways or slightly up/down markets. It’s a money-printing machine when volatility is high and stocks are range-bound. But in a raging bull market? You lag. Hard.
This has been apparent in JEPQ’s performance.
JEPQ vs. QQQ: The Numbers Don’t Lie
Since its inception in May 2022, JEPQ has provided impressive income but lagged total return performance compared to QQQ.
Total Return Comparison (as of May 2025):
-
JEPQ: ~14% cumulative return (thanks largely to reinvested dividends)
-
QQQ: ~28% cumulative return
That’s a 14 percentage point difference in just under three years. Why? Because JEPQ capped much of the tech upside during rallies, while QQQ let it rip.
And remember: JEPQ investors paid for that 11% yield by giving up total returns.
It’s like a payday loan for your portfolio—you get cash now, but it costs you more down the line.
Volatility and Risk: Not As Safe As You Think
One reason JEPQ is marketed to income-focused investors is the perception that the covered call strategy reduces volatility. After all, collecting premium income every month sounds stabilizing, right?
Partially true—but also misleading.
JEPQ’s volatility is lower than QQQ, yes, but not by a wide margin. And during sharp market drops—like the late 2022 tech pullback or any risk-off event—the ETF still falls. It’s still heavily invested in volatile tech stocks. It’s not a bond substitute.
Moreover, during those drops, the income strategy offers less protection. The call premiums collected shrink when volatility declines, and downside risk remains.
You’re not getting true downside protection—just a little cushioning.
Tax Considerations: The Hidden Drag
Many investors looking at JEPQ don’t consider the tax implications of that juicy income.
That 11% yield? It’s mostly non-qualified. That means it’s taxed at your ordinary income rate, not the lower qualified dividend rate.
For investors in higher tax brackets, this can be a real killer.
Example:
-
A 35% tax rate turns an 11% yield into a net 7.15%.
-
Compare that to a qualified dividend or long-term capital gains rate of 15-20%—and the advantage shrinks.
In taxable accounts, the tax drag makes JEPQ far less attractive than it seems. It’s best held in tax-advantaged accounts like IRAs, where the income isn’t immediately taxed.
Who Should Consider JEPQ?
Despite all these caveats, JEPQ isn’t a bad fund. It’s just often misunderstood.
JEPQ can be a great fit for:
-
Retirees looking for monthly income and less reliance on selling shares.
-
Investors in tax-sheltered accounts who want high cash flow.
-
Risk-tolerant income chasers who understand the opportunity cost.
But it’s not ideal for:
-
Growth-focused investors.
-
Taxable account holders in high tax brackets.
-
Those who think the 11% yield comes with no trade-offs.
JEPQ vs. JEPI: Sibling Rivalry
Many investors compare JEPQ to JEPI, the older sibling that focuses on large-cap S&P 500 stocks. While they share a strategy, they differ in risk and reward.
JEPI is more conservative. JEPQ offers more upside—but also more downside. It’s a “choose your risk” buffet.
The Alternative: DIY Covered Calls
If you like the idea of covered calls but want more control, you could DIY it.
Buy QQQ or your favorite tech stocks, and sell call options yourself through a brokerage that allows options trading. You can control strike prices, expirations, and manage taxes.
The downside? You need to:
-
Understand options.
-
Monitor positions.
-
Deal with early assignments and paperwork.
For many, JEPQ is a hands-off way to get this strategy without hassle. But remember, convenience has a cost.
The Bottom Line
JEPQ’s 11% yield is not a scam, nor is it magic. It’s a calculated income strategy that works best in sideways markets and for those prioritizing cash flow over growth.
But the cost is real:
-
Capped upside during bull markets.
-
Tax inefficiency in taxable accounts.
-
Limited downside protection during bear markets.
In the right hands, JEPQ is a powerful tool. But like any tool, it can cause damage if misused.
So before you chase yield, ask yourself:
-
Do I understand what I’m giving up for that 11%?
-
Am I okay with underperformance in bull markets?
-
Do I need this income, or am I falling for the headline?
JEPQ isn’t a trap—but it’s not a free lunch either. The 11% yield comes at a cost. Make sure you’re willing to pay it.
Disclosure: This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always consult your financial advisor before making investment decisions.